Here is the
update:
Cancer fear over cola colourings: Call to ban ingredient used in Coke and Pepsi
By Sean Poulter
Last updated at 9:57 AM on 17th February 2011Read moreAn ingredient used in Coca-Cola and Pepsi is a cancer risk and should be banned, an influential lobby group has claimed.
The concerns relate to an artificial brown colouring agent that the researchers say could be causing thousands of cancers.
‘The caramel colouring used in Coca-Cola, Pepsi, and other foods is contaminated with two cancer-causing chemicals and should be banned,’ said the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), a health lobby group based in Washington, DC.
‘In contrast to the caramel one might make at home by melting sugar in a saucepan, the artificial brown colouring in colas and some other products is made by reacting sugars with ammonia and sulphites under high pressure and temperatures.
‘Chemical reactions result in the formation of two substances known as 2-MI and 4-MI which in government-conducted studies caused lung, liver, or thyroid cancer or leukaemia in laboratory mice or rats.’
America’s National Toxicology Program says that there is ‘clear evidence’ that both 2-MI and 4-MI are animal carcinogens, and therefore likely to pose a risk to humans.
Researchers at the University of California, Davis, found significant levels of 4-MI in five brands of cola.
A health risk? America's National Toxicology Program says
both 2-MI and 4-MI found in Coke are animal carcinogens.The executive director of the CSPI, Michael F Jacobson, has petitioned America’s food regulator, the Food & Drug Administration, to take action.He said: ‘Carcinogenic colourings have no place in the food supply, especially considering that their only function is a cosmetic one.’
Mr Jacobson said the name ‘caramel colouring’ does not accurately describe the additives, explaining: ‘It’s a concentrated dark brown mixture of chemicals that simply does not occur in nature.’
Popular drink: The Beatles drinking bottles of coca cola
in Paris in 1964. Scientists say its 'caramel colour' is a
mixture of chemicals that does not occur in nature.He added that while regular caramel could not be described as healthy, ‘at least it is not tainted with carcinogens’.
U.S. regulations distinguish between four types of caramel colouring, two of which are produced with ammonia and two without it. The CSPI wants the two made with ammonia to be banned and has received backing from five prominent cancer experts, including several who have worked at the National Toxicology Program.
The type used in colas and other dark soft drinks is known as Caramel IV, or ammonia sulphite process caramel. Caramel III, which is produced with ammonia but not sulphites, is sometimes used in beer, soy sauce, and other foods.
The CSPI admitted that any risk associated with consumption of the chemicals would be extremely small. It said the ten teaspoons of sugar found in a can of regular cola would be more of a health problem.
However, it argued the levels of 4-MI in the tested colas still may be causing thousands of cancers in the U.S. population alone.
Earlier this week, it was claimed that Coca-Cola’s secret recipe had been leaked. It was even suggested it might be possible to recreate the taste and look on the kitchen table.
The leak claims were denied by the company, where a spokesman said: ‘Many third parties have tried to crack our secret formula. Try as they might, they’ve been unsuccessful because there is only one “Real Thing”.’
Coca-Cola and Pepsi did not respond to a request for a response to the CSPI claims.
This morning Coca-Cola rejected the CSPI’s concerns.
A spokesman said: ‘Our beverages are completely safe. CSPI’s statement irresponsibly insinuates that the caramel used in our beverages is unsafe and maliciously raises cancer concerns among consumers.
'This does a disservice to the very public for which CSPI purports to serve.
‘Studies show that the caramel we use does not cause cancer.’
The company said its drinks do not contain 2-MEI. It said they do contain 4-MEI in trace amounts.
It said: ‘These extrapolations by CSPI to human health and cancer are totally unfounded.’
And one more old article
article:
Coca-cola to phase out controversial chemical linked to hyperactivity and gene damage
By Colin Fernandez
Last updated at 8:41 PM on 25th May 2008Soft drink giant Coca-Cola is phasing out a controversial additive that has been linked to hyperactivity and causing damage to DNA.
The chemical Sodium Benzoate, also known as E211, is used to stop fizzy drinks going mouldy.
But recent research has shown that the chemical can deactivate parts of DNA, the genetic code in the cells of living creatures.
Phase out: Coca cola is withdrawing the chemical
sodium benzoate, which is used to stop fizzy drinks
going mouldyCoca-Cola said it was withdrawing the additive from Diet Coke in response to consumer demand for more natural products.
The move will mean that by the end of the year no can will contain E211 - and it plans to remove it from its other products as soon as possible.
But the company said at present it had not found a satisfactory alternative to replace the additive in some soft drinks with a higher juice content including Fanta and Dr Pepper.
Other fizzy drinks made by rival companies, such as Irn-Bru, Pepsi Max and Lucozade will continue to contain the additive.
While the chemical occurs naturally in some fruits, such as prunes, apples and cranberries, it is used in much greater strengths by the soft drinks industry.
Peter Piper, a professor of molecular biology research at Sheffield University found that the additive could switch off vital parts of DNA that could be linked to cirrhosis of the liver and Parkinson's disease.
He has also called for further research into the chemical.
In combination with vitamin C (CORR) sodium benzoate can form a potentially cancer-causing substance, benzene.
However the government-backed Committee on Mutagenicity - which investigates whether chemicals cause cancer - has dismissed the research.
The panel argue that while Sodium Benzoate has been shown to be harmful to yeast cells, it argues that human cells are stronger.
But Professor Piper called the dismissal a 'whitewash' that failed to take into account modern techniques of monitoring DNA damage.
Research by Southampton University found that sodium benzoate was one of seven additives - the six others being food colours -that can lead to hyperactivity.
The Food Standards Agency called for the six colours to be withdrawn from UK products - although sodium benzoate has been allowed to remain.
Coca-Cola said it had begun removing sodium benzoate from Diet Coke production in January.
A company spokesperson said: 'We are continuously looking at emerging trends and listening to our consumers thoughts about ingredients.
'For a number of years we have been moving towards non-artificial colours, flavours and preservatives where possible in our drinks.
'We are looking to phase out the use of sodium benzoate where technically possible.'
The company stressed that E211 was an approved additive by many worldwide bodies including the European Food Standards Agency.
Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co....mage.html#ixzz1Hym6GCbM
A few more articles can be found here:http://www.dailymail.co....ax-Coca-Cola-Pepsi.html
http://www.ma-vip.com/co...rigger-cancer-1545.html
http://www.newser.com/st...ed-to-cancer-study.html
http://www.newser.com/st...g-giving-us-cancer.html
http://www.buzzbox.com/n...cola/?clusterId=3280823
http://thelibertyguardia...tivist-call-fda-to-ban/
http://www.sott.net/arti...-used-in-Coke-and-Pepsi
Walter
